Not enough validated data
A dataset can look finished until a subject-matter expert reviews it properly. Then the team finds weak labels, inconsistent decisions, and too many edge cases to trust it in development.
Data that keeps up with AI
SME-validated datasets and evaluations that keep up with the pace of healthcare AI. Teams do not just need more data - they need data they can trust, in the right structure, fast enough to keep development moving. That's why we built Temyrion.
Cardiology discharge notes
340 records - ICD-10 labeling
Scope defined
Schema + review criteria agreed
Clinician review
3 cardiologists - adjudication complete
Structured output delivered
Cross-validation package included
Inter-rater agreement
94.2%
Edge cases flagged
18 / 340
We built Temyrion after seeing too many teams hit the same wall: they were ready to build, but the data was not ready to use. It was not validated enough, not structured for the actual workflow, and too slow to arrive.
A dataset can look finished until a subject-matter expert reviews it properly. Then the team finds weak labels, inconsistent decisions, and too many edge cases to trust it in development.
Even when the underlying data is useful, it often arrives in the wrong shape. The schema does not match the team's process, the outputs are not usable, and the team loses another cycle asking for revisions.
When every iteration takes too long, engineering cannot move, evaluation gets delayed, and product progress depends on waiting instead of learning.
Teams building healthcare AI often hit the same bottleneck: they need SMEs to create gold datasets, define rubrics, review difficult outputs, and evaluate whether systems are actually improving. But off-the-shelf provider processes are often too shallow, too rigid, or too slow. We help teams move faster by combining SMEs with a reliable review and delivery process that makes expert work more structured and efficient.
Cardiology discharge notes
~300 records - format TBD
Messy intake
No schema - 3 conflicting files
Unclear rubric
Revision #4 - criteria still shifting
Weak labels
No clinician sign-off - edge cases skipped
Label agreement
unknown
Delivery date
TBD
Need 200 medical papers labeled by SMEs? We source, structure, label, quality-check, and deliver benchmark-ready data.
Send documents, literature, transcripts, spreadsheets, or model outputs. We return validated structured outputs, rubrics, and evaluation assets.
Send flagged failures or sampled outputs. We run SME review, refresh datasets, and help you track whether your system is getting better.
We align on the clinical task, data schema, review criteria, and delivery format before work starts.
We turn source materials into structured tasks so experts can review quickly and consistently.
Relevant experts review, label, correct, and adjudicate difficult cases.
You receive validated datasets, JSON outputs, rubrics, or refreshed evaluation slices ready to use.
Healthcare AI breaks on nuance. Generic annotation workflows are not enough when the work depends on real SME review.
If the schema, rubric, or output format does not fit the team's process, the team still cannot build.
When every change takes another round trip, engineering and product end up waiting instead of learning.
We make expert review easier on our side, so SMEs spend their time reviewing difficult cases instead of wrestling with docx files, spreadsheets, and manual formatting.
Sometimes the right start is one dataset, one eval slice, or one blocked workflow - not a heavyweight engagement.
We provide SME-validated datasets, structured outputs, and evaluation support for healthcare AI teams. We combine SME-led review with a structured validation process, so every rubric, gold set, and output can be checked before it reaches your team.
If you are blocked on unreliable labels, unusable output structure, or slow provider cycles, send us the problem. We will tell you quickly whether we can help and what a practical first step looks like.
Book a 20-minute call